CA. Akhilesh Kumarcaakhilesh.in
PERSONAL FINANCEAvalanche, Snowball,and What ActuallyGets Debt PaidAttack any rate near 30% first; otherwiseclear a small balance, then go highest-rate.CA Akhilesh Kumar· caakhilesh.inTWO ORDERS, THE SAME DEBTSBY RATE: COSTLIEST FIRST36%24%14%9%BY BALANCE: SMALLEST FIRST20K45K90K2LONE SAVES MORE, ONE KEEPS YOU GOING30%Rate to attackfirst24% → 6%Transfer beatsorderingA few %Avalanche vssnowball gapTWO ORDERS, THE SAME DEBTSBY RATE: COSTLIEST FIRST36%24%14%9%BY BALANCE: SMALLEST FIRST20K45K90K2LONE SAVES MORE, ONE KEEPS YOU GOINGNº 22
Personal Finance · 6 min read · Summary infographic ↓

Avalanche, Snowball, and What Actually Gets Debt Paid

One method is mathematically optimal. The other has better completion rates. The research on which wins is more interesting than the argument.

By CA Akhilesh Kumar ACA, Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (2022) · Gurgaon
Personal FinanceBudgeting

The debate is well-worn. Avalanche says pay the highest interest rate first, because that minimises total interest. Snowball says pay the smallest balance first, because closing an account is motivating. Avalanche is correct on arithmetic. Snowball is frequently correct on outcomes.

The size of the disagreement

It is smaller than the internet suggests. For a typical mix of consumer balances, the total interest difference between the two methods over a full payoff often amounts to a few percent of the debt — real money, but not usually the difference between success and failure. The difference in completion rate is larger.

A method you abandon in month four has an effective interest rate of infinity.

Research from behavioural economists — most notably work by Gal and McShane on consumer debt accounts — has found that closing individual accounts, rather than reducing total balance, is the better predictor of eventual payoff. The mechanism appears to be a sense of progress: visible completed steps sustain effort in a way that a slowly shrinking aggregate does not.

A practical synthesis

  1. List every debt — balance, rate, minimum payment. Most people have never seen the whole picture on one page, and the exercise itself changes behaviour.
  2. Pay every minimum, always. Missed payments cost far more than method choice, through fees and credit damage.
  3. If one rate is dramatically higher — a payday loan, a card at 30% — attack it first regardless of balance. The arithmetic is too lopsided to argue with.
  4. Otherwise, clear one or two small balances first for the momentum, then switch to strict highest-rate order.
  5. Roll every freed-up minimum payment into the next target. This is the part that does the actual work, and it is common to both methods.

The options people forget

Before optimising the order, check whether the rate itself is negotiable. Balance transfer offers, consolidation loans at a lower rate, and — for anyone genuinely struggling — non-profit credit counselling, which can often negotiate rate reductions directly with creditors. Moving a balance from 24% to 6% dwarfs any ordering decision.

And a caution: consolidation only helps if the underlying spending stops. Clearing cards with a loan and then re-running the balances is the most common way a good decision becomes a worse position.


Educational content, not financial advice. If you are in serious difficulty, a non-profit debt advice service is a better first call than any blog.

Summary

This piece, as an infographic

Download
PERSONAL FINANCEAvalanche, Snowball, and What Actually GetsDebt PaidAttack any rate near 30% first; otherwise clear a small balance, then go highest-rate.AvalancheHighest rate firstMinimises total interestCorrect on arithmeticGap is often a few percent of the debtSnowballSmallest balance firstClosing an account is motivatingFrequently correct on outcomesClosed accounts predict eventual payoffWHICH DEBT FIRST?Is one rate dramatically higher — a paydayloan, a card at 30%?Attack it firstregardless of balanceNext question ↓YESNOCan the rate itself be moved — transfer,consolidation?Move it: 24% to 6%dwarfs any orderingClear 1–2 smallbalances, then by rateYESNOKEY FIGURES30%Rate to attack first24% → 6%Transfer beats orderingA few %Avalanche vs snowball gapA PRACTICAL SYNTHESIS01List every debtBalance, rate, minimum payment, all on one page02Pay every minimumMissed payments cost far more than method choice03Kill the outlier rateA payday loan or a 30% card goes first regardless of balance04Momentum, then rateClear one or two small balances, then strict highest-rate order05Roll the freed minimumsInto the next target; this is the part that does the actual workCOMPARISON SNAPSHOTVSWhat mattersPay every minimum, alwaysRoll freed-up minimums into the next targetCheck whether the rate itself is negotiableWhat people get wrongA method abandoned in month four: infiniterateConsolidating, then re-running the balancesOverrating the avalanche–snowball gapEducational content, not financial advice; in serious difficulty, a non-profit debt advice service is abetter callCA Akhilesh Kumarcaakhilesh.in

Every figure on it comes from the piece above. Share it freely — a link back is all that is asked.

Use it

The tools for this piece.

Run the figures the piece talks about — everything works in your browser, nothing is stored.